False Solutions

For several reasons, I am obliged to blog this rather overlooked, minor player in the cacophony of voices clamoring to be heard here at COP-14 (the formal designation of the meeting).  As I have noted elsewhere (see Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing post) there are numerous false solutions to global warming being foisted on the world.  Some may prove to be so in hindsight, since the consequences of major tinkering with the systems of the Earth by our imperfect minds and hands can never quite be completely anticipated. But others may prove to be the product of the same self-interested, flawed paradigms that created the problem in the first place.

I gained admission to COP-14 as the ‘guest’ of the Ecology Center, out of Berkeley California (another long story that one, since we were mutually strangers in the great climate change cloud before the conference).  Their primary message here in Poznan relates to the closely related false-solution/true-solution pair of waste incineration and recycling.

There are those here at the conference who would like the incineration of garbage to be counted as a ‘Clean Development Mechanism’ (CDM), and so be subsidized activities under the terms of that ‘mechanism’.  This idea is a travesty.  It essentially gives another subsidy and incentive to a completely unsustainable practice, the incineration of the hugely bloated waste stream of our voracious global, consumerist economy.  It does not take a PhD to understand that the true solution, in contrast to this distorted idea, is that somehow humanity must find a way of reducing the very waste stream that would be incentivized otherwise, designing and creating products which last far longer than is currently the case (and is tolerated by the sleeping masses who have grown accustomed to this inherent planned obsolescence), can be repaired economically rather than the norm of being discarded as trash, and to recycle ever single stitch of that waste stream that can be recycled.  The concept of cradle-to-cradle must become the ‘law of the land’.  Every company in the world that creates a product must find a way to redesign that product so that is utilizes a minimum of the resources of Creation as feedstock and energy, that anticipates the re-use of every possible component and material, and then be held responsible for creating individual or shared ways of collecting those products as they reach their extended useful lifetimes for the reclamation, reuse and recycling of its components.

Talk about a paradigm shift from the current norms!  Yes, this may be a Utopian idea, but it does not take a Nostradamus to predict that such ideas will evolve into the mainstream as humanity foolishly continues to rape the planet of her stores of raw materials, and to foul both the air and the water with the products and by-products of our foolish, blindly short-sighted ways.

For the Earth – §


One Response to False Solutions

  1. hernadi-key says:

    information for you..
    The Effects of Global Warming in Africa !!!

    Africa is the continent that will suffer most under climate change. Temperature rise will trigger “sharp declines in crop yield in tropical regions”, estimated at 5 to 10 % in Africa with an associated increase in undernourishment, malnutrition, malaria and related deaths.

    50 % of all malnutrition-related deaths (4 million annually worldwide) occur in Africa, while a 2�C rise in temperature will increase the people affected by hunger, potentially by 30 to 200 million worldwide…

    read more…



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: